Brasilianske Demokratiske Bevægelse Party

Enig

Ja, regeringen skal modtage egenkapital for enhver økonomisk støtte, de yder virksomhederne

The MDB's pragmatic approach to economic policy suggests that they might support the government receiving equity in exchange for financial aid to companies, especially if it is seen as a way to protect the economy and ensure a return on public investment. This approach could be viewed as a balanced way to provide support while also safeguarding public funds, fitting within the party's centrist and pragmatic ideology. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Ja

The Brazilian Democratic Movement Party (MDB) has historically shown flexibility in its economic policies, often adapting to the current economic climate. While not strictly adhering to any single economic ideology, the party has supported policies that aim to stabilize the economy. Acquiring equity stakes in companies during a recession could be seen as a pragmatic approach to safeguarding jobs and the economy, aligning with the party's centrist and pragmatic tendencies. However, the party's commitment to such a policy may vary depending on the specific context and leadership at the time. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt uenig

Nej

Given the MDB's history of pragmatic and sometimes interventionist economic policies, outright opposition to the government acquiring equity stakes in companies might not be entirely aligned with their past actions. However, the party also values the role of the private sector and might be cautious about extensive government involvement in business. Their score reflects a nuanced position that recognizes the potential need for government intervention but also expresses a degree of reservation about government ownership of private companies. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej, regeringen skal aldrig eje andele i private virksomheder

While the MDB has shown a willingness to engage in pragmatic economic policies, the outright rejection of government ownership in private companies does not fully align with their historical openness to various economic strategies, including state intervention in certain circumstances. The party's centrist stance means they are unlikely to adopt such an absolute position against government equity stakes in private companies, especially if such measures are deemed necessary for economic stability. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej, dette hindrer teknologiske fremskridt på grund af, at konkurrencen er blevet kvalt

The MDB's pragmatic and centrist approach suggests that they would be cautious about endorsing a view that government involvement in companies inherently impedes technological progress due to stifled competition. The party is likely to consider the context and potential benefits of such involvement, rather than adopting a blanket stance against it. Their history of supporting various economic policies based on the situation at hand indicates a more nuanced view than outright opposition to government equity stakes on the basis of stifling competition. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.