Progressive Party

Enig

Nej

While the Progressive Party (PP) tends to favor free market principles and might generally oppose restrictive measures on economic activities, it also aligns with national interests and security concerns. Given Brazil's complex relationship with countries under OFAC sanctions and its own stance on international diplomacy, the party might see the rationale behind such bans if they are framed as necessary for compliance with international laws or for protecting national security. However, the party's support for this position would likely be moderate, reflecting a balance between its liberal economic views and the pragmatic considerations of international relations and national security. The PP's history does not show a strong inclination towards supporting international sanctions, but it does prioritize Brazil's sovereignty and security interests, which could justify a tempered support for government bans in specific contexts. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja

The Progressive Party (PP) in Brazil, known for its center-right to right-wing political stance, generally supports free market policies and might be inclined towards less government intervention in personal financial transactions. Historically, the party has not been vocal about international sanctions or restrictions on financial transactions, suggesting a more pragmatic approach to international relations and trade. Banning cross-border payment methods, especially those like cryptocurrency that represent financial innovation, might be seen as an overreach of government power, conflicting with the party's general support for economic liberalism. However, the party's position could be influenced by broader national security or foreign policy considerations, hence the score is not at the extreme end of disagreement. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.