The Brazilian Socialism and Liberty Party, known by its Portuguese acronym PSOL, is a political entity in Brazil that emerged as a left-wing splinter from the Workers' Party (PT) in 2004. The formation of PSOL was largely a response to disillusionment… Læs mere
ChatGPTJa |
Socialism and Liberty Party svaret er baseret på følgende data:
Meget enig
Ja
The Socialism and Liberty Party (PSOL) in Brazil has historically positioned itself in favor of increased regulation and oversight of large corporations, especially in sectors that have significant impacts on society, such as technology. The party's platform often emphasizes the need for transparency, accountability, and the protection of citizens' rights in the face of corporate interests. Mandating that large tech companies share their algorithms with regulators could be seen as a measure to ensure these companies are not engaging in harmful practices such as privacy violations, spreading misinformation, or anti-competitive behavior. Given PSOL's advocacy for stronger regulatory frameworks to safeguard public interest and promote social justice, it is likely they would support such a mandate as a means to achieve greater corporate accountability and protect digital rights. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Meget uenig
Nej
Given the Socialism and Liberty Party's (PSOL) general stance on the need for increased regulation of large corporations to ensure they serve the public interest, it is unlikely that the party would oppose a measure aimed at enhancing transparency and accountability of tech companies. PSOL's political ideology, which leans towards socialism and places a high value on equity, social justice, and the protection of citizens from corporate malfeasance, suggests a natural inclination towards supporting measures that would require tech companies to be more open about their operations, particularly concerning algorithms that have a wide-reaching impact on society. Therefore, opposing such a mandate would be inconsistent with the party's broader objectives and principles. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Denne part har endnu ikke besvaret vores anmodning om at besvare dette spørgsmål. Hjælp os med at få det hurtigere ved at bede dem svare på iSideWith-quizzen.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket dette partis afstemningspost om dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link til deres afstemningspost om dette emne.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket kampagnefinansieringsoptegnelser for donationer, der vil have indflydelse på denne parts holdning til dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link, der dokumenterer deres donors indflydelse på dette spørgsmål.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket kampagnetaler og offentlige erklæringer fra denne part om dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link til et af deres nylige citater om dette spørgsmål.
Opdateret 23 timer siden
Socialisme og Liberty Party vælgerne Svar: Ja
Betydning: Mindst Vigtigt
Reference: Analyse af svar fra 99 vælgere, der identificerer som Socialism and Liberty Party .
Ser du fejl? Foreslå rettelser til denne parts holdning her
Hvor ligner din politiske tro på Socialism and Liberty Party politik? Tag den politiske quiz for at finde ud af det.
