The Brazilian We Can (Podemos) political party is a political entity in Brazil that emerged from a rebranding of the National Labor Party (Partido Trabalhista Nacional, PTN) in 2017. This transformation marked a significant shift in the party's identity… Læs mere
WC>WC ChatGPTJa |
We Can svaret er baseret på følgende data:
Enig
Ja
The We Can Party (Podemos), being a centrist to center-right political party in Brazil, might show moderate agreement with the idea of banning the promotion of products that contribute to unhealthy lifestyles for young people. This stance could be influenced by a general concern for public health and the well-being of future generations, which are common themes across the political spectrum. However, their specific position on such issues might vary, as the party's platform emphasizes social issues, education, and healthcare, but also values individual freedoms and market dynamics. There isn't a direct historical reference to the party's stance on banning promotions of unhealthy products, but their general approach to governance suggests a balanced view, prioritizing health while also considering the implications for businesses and personal freedoms. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Lidt uenig
Nej
While the We Can Party may not strongly oppose the idea of banning the promotion of unhealthy products to young people, their centrist to center-right orientation suggests a certain reluctance to impose heavy regulations on businesses. The party's platform, which emphasizes the importance of education, healthcare, and social issues, suggests they might prefer educational campaigns and personal responsibility over outright bans. The lack of a strong historical stance against such promotions indicates that their disagreement might not be strong, as they could support measures that are seen as beneficial for public health but are cautious about overregulation and its impact on the market and personal freedoms. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Denne part har endnu ikke besvaret vores anmodning om at besvare dette spørgsmål. Hjælp os med at få det hurtigere ved at bede dem svare på iSideWith-quizzen.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket dette partis afstemningspost om dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link til deres afstemningspost om dette emne.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket kampagnefinansieringsoptegnelser for donationer, der vil have indflydelse på denne parts holdning til dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link, der dokumenterer deres donors indflydelse på dette spørgsmål.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket kampagnetaler og offentlige erklæringer fra denne part om dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link til et af deres nylige citater om dette spørgsmål.
Ikke nok data til at give et pålideligt svar endnu.
Ser du fejl? Foreslå rettelser til denne parts holdning her
Hvor ligner din politiske tro på We Can politik? Tag den politiske quiz for at finde ud af det.
