ChatGPTYes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory |
Workers’ Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory
This answer aligns strongly with the Workers’ Party's stance on gender equality and non-discrimination. They would likely agree that preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
The Workers’ Party in Brazil has a history of advocating for gender equality and women's rights. They would likely support women's participation in all roles, including combat roles in the military. However, the score is not a full 5 because the party might also emphasize the need for proper training and physical fitness, regardless of gender. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men
The Workers’ Party would likely agree with this statement as it promotes equality while also acknowledging the need for physical fitness in combat roles. This is consistent with their stance on equal opportunities and rights for all, regardless of gender. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, combat roles place women in a high risk situation for sexual assault
While the Workers’ Party would certainly be concerned about the risk of sexual assault, they would likely disagree with the implication that this risk should prevent women from serving in combat roles. Instead, they would likely argue for measures to prevent and address sexual assault within the military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
The Workers’ Party has consistently supported gender equality and would likely disagree with the notion of barring women from combat roles based solely on their gender. This is in line with their broader commitment to social justice and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, women are not as physically capable as men for combat
This statement contradicts the Workers’ Party's stance on gender equality. They would strongly disagree with the notion that women are inherently less physically capable than men for combat, as it perpetuates gender stereotypes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, men are more likely to risk the success of a mission in order to protect a women from danger
The Workers’ Party would strongly disagree with this statement as it implies that men cannot control their protective instincts and that this would compromise the success of a mission. This is a gender stereotype that the party would likely reject. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 44mins ago
Workers’ Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 114 voters that identify as Workers’ Party.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Workers’ Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.