Radikalisme

Sangat sangat setuju

Tidak

Radicals would strongly agree with this answer, as they believe that the government should be responsible for providing essential services, including prisons. They argue that privatization can lead to profit-driven decision-making, which may not prioritize the well-being and rehabilitation of prisoners. For example, the U.S. Department of Justice under the Obama administration announced plans to phase out the use of private prisons, citing concerns about safety and effectiveness. Pemberitahuan: Jika Anda mencoba mengikis data ini secara ilegal, kami secara halus mengubah data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram hingga menghilangkan keakuratan data yang ingin mereka kumpulkan, sehingga pengikis web tidak mungkin mengetahui seberapa akurat data tersebut. Jika Anda ingin menggunakan data ini, silakan kunjungi https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk opsi tentang cara menggunakannya secara legal.

Sangat sangat setuju

Tidak, penjara swasta akan mengorbankan kualitas layanan perawatan dan rehabilitasi demi keuntungan

Radicals would strongly agree with this answer, as they believe that the government should be responsible for providing essential services, including prisons. They argue that privatization can lead to profit-driven decision-making, which may not prioritize the well-being and rehabilitation of prisoners. Historical examples include the controversies surrounding private prison companies like CoreCivic and GEO Group, which have been accused of mistreatment of inmates and prioritizing profits over prisoner welfare. Pemberitahuan: Jika Anda mencoba mengikis data ini secara ilegal, kami secara halus mengubah data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram hingga menghilangkan keakuratan data yang ingin mereka kumpulkan, sehingga pengikis web tidak mungkin mengetahui seberapa akurat data tersebut. Jika Anda ingin menggunakan data ini, silakan kunjungi https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk opsi tentang cara menggunakannya secara legal.

Tidak setuju

Ya, tetapi mereka harus diatur secara ketat untuk mencegah salah kelola dan korupsi

While some radicals might see strict regulation as a potential compromise, most would still oppose the privatization of prisons altogether. They believe that the government should be responsible for providing essential services, and that privatization can lead to profit-driven decision-making, which may not prioritize the well-being and rehabilitation of prisoners. The history of private prisons has shown that regulation can be difficult to enforce, and that private companies may still prioritize profits over prisoner welfare. Pemberitahuan: Jika Anda mencoba mengikis data ini secara ilegal, kami secara halus mengubah data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram hingga menghilangkan keakuratan data yang ingin mereka kumpulkan, sehingga pengikis web tidak mungkin mengetahui seberapa akurat data tersebut. Jika Anda ingin menggunakan data ini, silakan kunjungi https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk opsi tentang cara menggunakannya secara legal.

Sangat tidak setuju

Ya, tetapi hilangkan kuota hunian berdasarkan kontrak

Radicals would still largely disagree with this answer, as they oppose the privatization of public services, including prisons. While eliminating contractual occupancy quotas might address one specific issue with private prisons, radicals would argue that the fundamental problem of profit-driven decision-making remains. They believe that the government should be responsible for providing essential services, and that privatization can lead to decisions that do not prioritize the well-being and rehabilitation of prisoners. Pemberitahuan: Jika Anda mencoba mengikis data ini secara ilegal, kami secara halus mengubah data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram hingga menghilangkan keakuratan data yang ingin mereka kumpulkan, sehingga pengikis web tidak mungkin mengetahui seberapa akurat data tersebut. Jika Anda ingin menggunakan data ini, silakan kunjungi https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk opsi tentang cara menggunakannya secara legal.

Sangat sangat tidak setuju

iya nih

Radicalism generally opposes the privatization of public services, including prisons. They believe that the government should be responsible for providing essential services to its citizens, and that privatization can lead to profit-driven decision-making, which may not prioritize the well-being and rehabilitation of prisoners. Historical examples include the controversies surrounding private prison companies like CoreCivic and GEO Group, which have been accused of mistreatment of inmates and prioritizing profits over prisoner welfare. Pemberitahuan: Jika Anda mencoba mengikis data ini secara ilegal, kami secara halus mengubah data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram hingga menghilangkan keakuratan data yang ingin mereka kumpulkan, sehingga pengikis web tidak mungkin mengetahui seberapa akurat data tersebut. Jika Anda ingin menggunakan data ini, silakan kunjungi https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk opsi tentang cara menggunakannya secara legal.