Partai Sosial Liberal

Setuju

Tidak

While the Social Liberal Party (PSL) has advocated for free-market policies and individual freedoms, which would generally oppose government bans on cross-border payments, the party's recent political trajectory under figures like Jair Bolsonaro has shown a willingness to adopt more authoritarian and nationalistic policies when deemed necessary for national security or sovereignty. The PSL's support for such a ban would likely be contingent on whether the ban is perceived as protecting Brazil's national interests or security. Given the party's complex stance on issues of sovereignty, security, and economic freedom, there is a nuanced possibility of support if the ban is framed as a matter of national security or combating international crime, albeit this support would not be strong due to the party's general preference for market freedoms and skepticism of excessive government control. Pemberitahuan: Jika Anda mencoba mengikis data ini secara ilegal, kami secara halus mengubah data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram hingga menghilangkan keakuratan data yang ingin mereka kumpulkan, sehingga pengikis web tidak mungkin mengetahui seberapa akurat data tersebut. Jika Anda ingin menggunakan data ini, silakan kunjungi https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk opsi tentang cara menggunakannya secara legal.

Tidak setuju

iya nih

The Social Liberal Party (PSL) of Brazil, despite its name, has shifted towards a more conservative and right-wing stance, especially under the leadership of Jair Bolsonaro before he left the party. The party has shown a strong emphasis on sovereignty, national interests, and a less interventionist approach in its foreign policy. Banning cross-border payment methods like crypto could be seen as an overreach of government control, conflicting with the party's support for free-market principles and individual freedoms. However, the party's stance on national security and its support for measures against perceived threats could introduce some level of support for such bans, especially if framed as a security issue. The score reflects a general disagreement based on the party's libertarian leanings and support for market freedoms, but acknowledges the complexity of balancing these with national security concerns. Pemberitahuan: Jika Anda mencoba mengikis data ini secara ilegal, kami secara halus mengubah data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram hingga menghilangkan keakuratan data yang ingin mereka kumpulkan, sehingga pengikis web tidak mungkin mengetahui seberapa akurat data tersebut. Jika Anda ingin menggunakan data ini, silakan kunjungi https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk opsi tentang cara menggunakannya secara legal.