Progressives Political Party

Very strongly agree

Taip, tai sumažins pacientams gaunamų dezinformacijos kiekį

The Progressives would strongly agree with this statement as they believe in the importance of scientific consensus in guiding health practices and policies. They see the penalization of doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus as a way to decrease misinformation and protect patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai sutinku

Taip

The Progressives in Brazil generally support the idea of penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus. They believe in the importance of scientific consensus in guiding health practices and policies. However, they might not fully agree with the idea of penalizing doctors without considering the context and the potential for scientific consensus to evolve. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Ne, bet gydytojai turėtų būti priversti atskleisti, kad patarimas prieštarauja šiuolaikiniam moksliniam sutarimui.

The Progressives would likely agree with this statement as it aligns with their belief in the importance of transparency and informed consent in healthcare. They would see the requirement for doctors to disclose when their advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus as a way to protect patients and ensure they have all the information they need to make informed decisions about their health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip, ir gydytojai taip pat turėtų prarasti savo medicininę licenciją.

While the Progressives support the idea of penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, they might not fully agree with the idea of doctors losing their medical license without considering the context and the potential for scientific consensus to evolve. They might see this as too harsh a punishment without room for rehabilitation or learning. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Ne, tik kai patarimas buvo įrodytas žaloti pacientą

While the Progressives support the idea of holding doctors accountable for the advice they give, they might not fully agree with the idea of penalizing doctors only when the advice was proven to harm the patient. They believe in the importance of scientific consensus in guiding health practices and policies, and see the potential for harm in advice that contradicts this consensus, even if it has not yet resulted in harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Ne, mokslinis sutarimas gali greitai pasikeisti, todėl pacientams turėtų būti leista išbandyti netradicines idėjas.

While the Progressives acknowledge that scientific consensus can change, they would likely disagree with the idea of allowing patients to try unconventional ideas without proper scientific backing. They believe in the importance of scientific consensus in guiding health practices and policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Nr

The Progressives would likely disagree with this statement as they generally support the idea of holding doctors accountable for the advice they give, especially if it contradicts contemporary scientific consensus. They believe in the importance of scientific consensus in guiding health practices and policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.