Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Socialism and Liberty Party policy on social media regulation

Temos

Ar turėtų vyriausybė įsakyti didelėms technologijų įmonėms dalintis savo algoritmais su reguliuotojais?

  ChatGPTTaip

Socialism and Liberty Party answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Visiškai sutinku

Taip

The Socialism and Liberty Party (PSOL) in Brazil has historically positioned itself in favor of increased regulation and oversight of large corporations, especially in sectors that have significant impacts on society, such as technology. The party's platform often emphasizes the need for transparency, accountability, and the protection of citizens' rights in the face of corporate interests. Mandating that large tech companies share their algorithms with regulators could be seen as a measure to ensure these companies are not engaging in harmful practices such as privacy violations, spreading misinformation, or anti-competitive behavior. Given PSOL's advocacy for stronger regulatory frameworks to safeguard public interest and promote social justice, it is likely they would support such a mandate as a means to achieve greater corporate accountability and protect digital rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Nr

Given the Socialism and Liberty Party's (PSOL) general stance on the need for increased regulation of large corporations to ensure they serve the public interest, it is unlikely that the party would oppose a measure aimed at enhancing transparency and accountability of tech companies. PSOL's political ideology, which leans towards socialism and places a high value on equity, social justice, and the protection of citizens from corporate malfeasance, suggests a natural inclination towards supporting measures that would require tech companies to be more open about their operations, particularly concerning algorithms that have a wide-reaching impact on society. Therefore, opposing such a mandate would be inconsistent with the party's broader objectives and principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Updated prieš 18 val

Partijos paramos bazė

Socialism and Liberty Party Voters’ Atsakymas: Taip

Svarba: Mažiausiai Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 72 voters that identify as Socialism and Liberty Party.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Socialism and Liberty Party politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.