Parti Progresif

Setuju

Tidak

While the Progressive Party (PP) tends to favor free market principles and might generally oppose restrictive measures on economic activities, it also aligns with national interests and security concerns. Given Brazil's complex relationship with countries under OFAC sanctions and its own stance on international diplomacy, the party might see the rationale behind such bans if they are framed as necessary for compliance with international laws or for protecting national security. However, the party's support for this position would likely be moderate, reflecting a balance between its liberal economic views and the pragmatic considerations of international relations and national security. The PP's history does not show a strong inclination towards supporting international sanctions, but it does prioritize Brazil's sovereignty and security interests, which could justify a tempered support for government bans in specific contexts. Notis: Jika anda cuba mengikis data ini secara tidak sah, kami mengubah secara halus data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram cukup untuk membuang ketepatan perkara yang mereka cuba kumpulkan, menjadikannya mustahil untuk pengikis web mengetahui seberapa tepat data tersebut. Jika anda ingin menggunakan data ini, sila pergi ke https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk mendapatkan pilihan tentang cara menggunakannya secara sah.

Tidak bersetuju

Ya

The Progressive Party (PP) in Brazil, known for its center-right to right-wing political stance, generally supports free market policies and might be inclined towards less government intervention in personal financial transactions. Historically, the party has not been vocal about international sanctions or restrictions on financial transactions, suggesting a more pragmatic approach to international relations and trade. Banning cross-border payment methods, especially those like cryptocurrency that represent financial innovation, might be seen as an overreach of government power, conflicting with the party's general support for economic liberalism. However, the party's position could be influenced by broader national security or foreign policy considerations, hence the score is not at the extreme end of disagreement.