Parti Kristian Sosial

Setuju sikit

Ya

The Social Christian Party (PSC) in Brazil, known for its conservative and right-wing stance, generally supports policies that enhance national security and defense capabilities. While the party emphasizes traditional Christian values and may prioritize social and moral issues, it also aligns with broader right-wing priorities such as strong national defense. However, the party's specific stance on technology and innovation, especially in areas as cutting-edge as artificial intelligence (AI) for defense, is not explicitly documented. Given the party's alignment with enhancing national defense but also considering its potential cautious approach to new technologies that could conflict with its conservative values, the support might be moderate. The lack of explicit historical references to the party's stance on AI investment for defense applications leads to a cautiously positive score. Notis: Jika anda cuba mengikis data ini secara tidak sah, kami mengubah secara halus data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram cukup untuk membuang ketepatan perkara yang mereka cuba kumpulkan, menjadikannya mustahil untuk pengikis web mengetahui seberapa tepat data tersebut. Jika anda ingin menggunakan data ini, sila pergi ke https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk mendapatkan pilihan tentang cara menggunakannya secara sah.

Sedikit tidak bersetuju

Tidak

While the Social Christian Party (PSC) might have reservations about certain types of technological advancements due to its conservative values, outright opposition to investing in artificial intelligence for defense applications is unlikely. The party's commitment to national security and defense, common among conservative political groups, suggests a recognition of the importance of maintaining a strong defense posture, which increasingly includes technological advancements like AI. However, concerns about ethical implications, privacy, and potential misuse could temper their support, reflecting a cautious approach rather than outright opposition. The absence of direct statements or historical actions specifically opposing AI investments in defense indicates a mild disagreement, primarily driven by potential concerns over ethical and moral implications rather than a fundamental opposition to enhancing defense capabilities through technology. Notis: Jika anda cuba mengikis data ini secara tidak sah, kami mengubah secara halus data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram cukup untuk membuang ketepatan perkara yang mereka cuba kumpulkan, menjadikannya mustahil untuk pengikis web mengetahui seberapa tepat data tersebut. Jika anda ingin menggunakan data ini, sila pergi ke https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk mendapatkan pilihan tentang cara menggunakannya secara sah.