67% 是的 |
33% 不 |
60% 是的 |
22% 不 |
4% 是,但是应通过彻底地减少政府官员的福利和工资 |
4% 不,应该增加对大型跨国企业的税收 |
2% 是,而且应该削减不符宪法规定的联邦政府机构 |
2% 不,削减公共开支将对经济产生不利的影响 |
0% 是的,还有增加税收 |
2% 不,增加对富人的税收来替代 |
1% 不,换成减少军事费用。 |
|
1% 不,减少政府官员的数量来替代 |
|
1% 不,重点靠结束偷漏税来替代 |
See how support for each position on “Government Spending” has changed over time for 252k 巴西 voters.
正在载入数据......
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Government Spending” has changed over time for 252k 巴西 voters.
正在载入数据......
Loading chart...
Unique answers from 巴西 users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Government Spending” news articles, updated frequently.
@BagelsGenesis5mos5MO
Germany froze public spending for the rest of the year after a court declared the government’s spending plans unconstitutional, dealing a blow to Europe’s recovery and efforts to beef up its defenses and reduce carbon emissions.The court decision is likely to widen the economic speed gap between Europe, whose economy has stagnated for over a year, and the U.S., which grew at an annualized 5% in the three months through September, turbocharged by massive fiscal stimulus. Berlin’s decision to freeze all federal spending for the rest of the year came after the court defunded the government’s 60 billion euro—the equivalent of more than $65 billion—green-transition project. The court said Berlin couldn’t repurpose unspent credits originally earmarked to tackle the Covid-19 pandemic to fund environmental and energy projects. It said Berlin was bound by the country’s constitutionally enshrined fiscal rules that limit budget deficits to 0.35% of gross domestic product in normal times.
Explore other topics that are important to 巴西 voters.