Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 堕胎
TJ>TJ Personal answer主张堕胎合法,提供节育、性教育以及更多社会服务能帮助减少堕胎数量 |
经济 › 同工同酬
TJ>TJ Personal answerPay should be based on results. |
经济 › 税
TJ>TJ Personal answerIncrease taxes on the rich but keep a lower rate for the less fortunate. |
社会 › LGBT收养权
TJ>TJ Personal answer是,只要他们通过与异性夫妇同样的背景检查。 |
医保 › 药品价格监管
TJ>TJ Personal answerYes, only to lower them. |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
TJ>TJ Personal answerFor the actual news there should only be unbiased facts. |
医保 › 精神健康
TJ>TJ Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
经济 › 政府支出
TJ>TJ Personal answer不,应该增加对大型跨国企业的税收 |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
TJ>TJ Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › 公共交通
TJ>TJ Personal answer是,而且提供更多免费公共交通 |
国内政策 › 任期限制
TJ>TJ Personal answerYes, but we should also switch to a unicameral parliamentary system. |
经济 › 全民基本收入
TJ>TJ Personal answer是的,所有人都应获得一份收入以支付包括食物与住房在内的必需品 |
国内政策 › 毒品政策
TJ>TJ Personal answer是的,并且追溯以往来减少对那些已经服刑的判决 |
社会 › 工作场所性别多元化
TJ>TJ Personal answer不应该,董事会成员应该是最有资格的人,不论性别 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
TJ>TJ Personal answer不 |
经济 › 经济刺激
TJ>TJ Personal answer应该,但采用增加基础设施支出的形式 |
罪行 › 运输毒品罪处以的刑罚
TJ>TJ Personal answer不应该,判处他们终身监禁,且不得假释 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
TJ>TJ Personal answerYes. Reform the whole criminal justice system so overcrowding doesn’t happen. |
经济 › 工会
TJ>TJ Personal answer理论上是有帮助的,但最近腐败现象太多,应该限制其权力 |
社会 › Gender Transition
TJ>TJ Personal answer不 |
环境 › Animal Testing
TJ>TJ Personal answerUse voluntary humans instead. |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
TJ>TJ Personal answer不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
TJ>TJ Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
TJ>TJ Personal answer不 |
经济 › 社会福利
TJ>TJ Personal answer增加限制,改革制度,使福利补充而不是替代工作收入 |
科学 › 核能
TJ>TJ Personal answer不,我们应该投资在更清洁的替代能源上,比如风能、水力发电、钍和地热 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
TJ>TJ Personal answer不 |
医保 › 安全港
TJ>TJ Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
社会 › 安乐死
TJ>TJ Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
TJ>TJ Personal answer应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品 |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
TJ>TJ Personal answerYes, but allow private care to be an option. |
外交政策 › 外国援助
TJ>TJ Personal answerDecrease, only give it to countries with zero human rights violations. |
罪行 › 罪犯投票权
TJ>TJ Personal answer是的,但是只在服完他们的刑期和缓刑之后 |
总统大选 › 竞选经费
TJ>TJ Personal answerOnly grassroots donations. |
医保 › World Health Organization
TJ>TJ Personal answerNo, fund national and local programs instead |
社会 › 女性在战斗中
TJ>TJ Personal answer应该,只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试 |
经济 › 福利毒品测试
TJ>TJ Personal answer应该,但是要为那些结果为阳性的人提供治疗办法 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
TJ>TJ Personal answer是的 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
TJ>TJ Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
TJ>TJ Personal answerYes, as long as the local environment is not compromised |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
TJ>TJ Personal answerFacts only |
移民 › 技术移民
TJ>TJ Personal answer减少,而且政府应该更多地鼓励我国公民为担任这些工作做好准备。 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
TJ>TJ Personal answerYes, if they are citizens. |
环境 › 水力压裂法
TJ>TJ Personal answer不,我们应该寻求更可持续的能源 |
移民 › 公民考试
TJ>TJ Personal answerIt should be based on how the country works |
移民 › 双重国籍
TJ>TJ Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
TJ>TJ Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.