Try the political quiz

1.8k Replies

 @94267X2 from Colorado answered…2yrs2Y

No and abolish both the world bank and the international monetary fund

 @93GS9ZW from Pennsylvania answered…2yrs2Y

 @558YLXVanswered…2yrs2Y

If these funds are part of a process to stabilize and modernize Afghanistan and the Taliban do not engage in unprovoked aggression against their neighbors.

 @6TD492H from California answered…2yrs2Y

 @92JXK3J from New York answered…2yrs2Y

Try to work towards peace with the Taliban and ensure that they respect the Afghan people whilst allowing them to reign. I do not like their policies but I believe their reign can be more beneficial to the Afghans than democracy, as monarchs and authoritarian leaders have worked in other Islamic states.

 @93GCYWX from Michigan answered…2yrs2Y

No, but they should provide aid to humanitarian efforts in the area.

 @8WZKS5D from Oregon answered…2yrs2Y

They should provide aid directly to the Afghanistan people and not the Taliban government.

 @93CS3TH from Texas answered…2yrs2Y

No, we should not provide financial aid for foreign entities with ideals different than ours.

 @7KD4Z5Q from Florida answered…2yrs2Y

No, not until further financial transparency has been established and publicized by the regime

 @4T6MX6Zanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only on the conditions that the Taliban liberalize the country.

 @9334YP3answered…2yrs2Y

No, the US should not only leave the World Bank and the IMF, but declare anyone employed by them outlaws and issue warrants for their arrest and bounties for their capture, dead or alive. In addition, the the US should sanction all member countries.

 @9324D72 from Arkansas answered…2yrs2Y

No, any aid should go directly to the people of Afghanistan rather than the Taliban.

 @6TTPNW6 from California answered…2yrs2Y

 @4XD28G7answered…2yrs2Y

I don't believe it is our responsibility to provide aid for other countries, especially those that are tyrannical.

 @JaamesWJ from Connecticut answered…2yrs2Y

 @8ZK5HYT from New York answered…2yrs2Y

 @2TXP8NBanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only domestic spending to improve the lives of their people, no money should go to purchasing or manufacturing weapons.

 @HannahEli6006 from Michigan answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, if it is guaranteed that the money will go towards the people of Afghanistan and not the Taliban

 @92BG2S6 from Indiana answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only to restore the country for the sake of citizens, and the funding is not used for human rights violations

 @48T6V4Vanswered…2yrs2Y

No, the World Bank and International Monetary Fund should be dismantled and replaced with anti-colonial cooperative institutions

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

 @8PD23XN from Missouri answered…2yrs2Y

 @925J4Q8 from Missouri answered…2yrs2Y

 @8NVXWB2 from North Carolina answered…2yrs2Y

 @9242PWT from North Carolina answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, as long as the money goes directly to the people not related to the Taliban. Money given to the Taliban should be limited or completely reduced either way.

 @8ZYQ3FR from California answered…2yrs2Y

yes, but for the one that qualify and actually uses it towards school and important things

 @8ZVVCMT from Virginia answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but if there is proof of injustice taking place in Afghanistan then revoke it.

  @clbcarmananswered…2yrs2Y

Yes. And with no privatization strings attached. And no sanctions! Nobody supports the Taliban, but letting children starve is worse. YouTuber BadEmpanada made a good video about this.

  @8T83KJZ from Connecticut answered…2yrs2Y

 @8SFDLS6 from Iowa answered…2yrs2Y

No, not until the government meets international standards regarding basic human rights and democracy.

  @8VHBC3L from West Virginia answered…2yrs2Y

 @8Z598CX from New York answered…2yrs2Y

 @8YLB9QX from Texas answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, in ways that would ensure humanitarian efforts to its citizens.

 @2PFH3VCanswered…2yrs2Y

Sanctions should be lifted as they hurt the Afghan people, but the IMF and World Bank are neoliberal bodies that should be abolished

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin answered…2yrs2Y

No, the aid should be coordinated through the United Nations to reach the intended families and children to prevent widespread hunger and destitution

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, the charitable funds are necessary to prevent widespread hunger and destitution among families throughout the country

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...