Leninism

Would you embrace a system that guarantees you a stable life, but limits your ability to rise above a certain economic level?

If a small and knowledgeable group proposed radical changes that would eventually benefit everyone, would their expertise earn your trust?

What role would you choose for yourself in a society where jobs were assigned based on community needs rather than personal passions?

Do you think the concept of 'for the common good' can justify actions that restrict certain liberties, and if so, under what circumstances?

What motivates you more, personal recognition for your achievements or the knowledge that you're contributing to a communal goal?

How do you feel about the idea of sacrificing personal wealth for the certainty that no one in your community goes without basic needs?

What personal freedoms are you willing to give up for the promise of job security and essential resources provided by society?

If your voice was merged into one collective societal decision, how would that change your engagement in community issues?

How would you feel about your personal success if society rewarded everyone equally, regardless of their role or contribution?

How does the idea of lifting each other up in a community affect your sense of independence and cooperation?

What lessons can be learned from the failure or success of group-oriented initiatives you've been a part of?

What would make you more willing to follow a leader: their vision for society or their methods of leadership?

How might the experience of mutual dependence in a close-knit community compare to competitive individualism?

If you had unlimited resources but had to use them for communal good, what would your first project be?

In a group project, have you ever felt that the outcome was more important than individual voices, and why?

How would daily motivation differ in a society where material success isn't the end goal?

What makes you trust or distrust the idea of a select group guiding a whole society?

How would you prioritize personal freedom versus societal benefit when considering the role of government?

If success was measured by community improvement rather than individual gain, how might that impact your future plans?

How would your motivation at school or work change if you were rewarded the same as everyone else, regardless of effort?

In a world concerned with collective well-being, what individual qualities or talents do you think would still be appreciated?

If you found out your personal data was being used to create an equitable society, would you see that as a fair trade?

Do you see any parallels between leadership in school projects and the idea of a vanguard party leading society, and what are they?

If you were assured the community would take care of all your needs, how would you decide where to dedicate your efforts?

How would the way you see your role in society change if personal achievement was no longer a measure of success?

What personal goals would you be willing to sacrifice if it meant a better standard of living for everyone in your community?

When considering long-term societal benefits, how do you weigh them against your immediate personal freedoms?

How might your relationships evolve if everyone around you shared equally in society’s wealth and resources?

If you had to depend on the community for your successes and failures, how might that shape your ambitions?

How would your day-to-day life change if competition was replaced by cooperation in every aspect?

What's your stance on the necessity of strong leadership versus the importance of everyone having a say in group decisions?

How would you feel if your choices were guided by a society that prioritizes the collective over the individual?

If a society provides for all your needs, what kind of work would you choose to do, and what would motivate you?

What kind of sacrifices do you believe are reasonable for the good of society, and where would you draw the line?

Have you ever wished for a strong leader to take charge and quickly resolve complex problems, and why?

How would you try to convince someone skeptical about sharing resources that it's a beneficial ideal?

In what ways might total equality in a community foster a sense of unity or erase valuable individual differences?

Imagine if all of your basic needs were met by society; what would you strive for next, and why?

How does equal access to healthcare, education, and housing for everyone align with your vision of a just society?

What would you do if you found out the government was limiting your information to maintain social harmony?

Is breaking established rules justifiable if it's done in the name of creating a more fair world for everyone?

How important is it to you that everyone's basic needs are met, even if it limits luxury and excess for some?

How would you feel if a small group decided what jobs everyone should work, including yours, to better society?

How much importance do you place on the notion of 'working for the common good,' and how does it shape your behavior?

Could living in a society where everyone has a uniform standard of living be satisfying or stifling for you?

What would you consider to be the greatest benefit and the biggest risk of living in a society guided by collective principles?

How do you think history might judge a society that puts collective goals above individual aspirations?

Can there be such a thing as too much control in the hands of the government when it comes to managing resources?

How would you feel if the pursuit of collective equality limited your personal development opportunities?