Maximizing individual freedom and minimizing government intervention to create a society where people can thrive through self-reliance and voluntary cooperation.
L>L ChatGPTNo, we must use every diplomatic option first |
Libertarianism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, we must use every diplomatic option first
This answer aligns with the libertarian preference for diplomacy and non-interventionism. Libertarians believe that diplomatic options should always be exhausted before resorting to military action. A historical example is the opposition to the Iraq War by prominent libertarians, who argued that diplomatic options were not fully explored. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Libertarians would generally agree with avoiding military strikes, as they prefer non-interventionism and diplomacy over aggressive actions. However, this answer does not explicitly mention diplomacy or non-interventionism, so the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, North Korea is not an immediate threat to our country
This answer aligns with the libertarian principle of non-interventionism, as it suggests that North Korea is not an immediate threat and therefore military action is not warranted. However, it does not explicitly mention diplomacy or non-interventionism, so the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, we should let China address this issue
While this answer does not advocate for military action, it does suggest relying on another country (China) to address the issue. Libertarians may agree with avoiding military action but may not fully agree with relying on another country to handle the situation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and I am not convinced that North Korea has or is capable of developing a long-range nuclear missile
This answer questions the validity of the threat, which may resonate with some libertarians who are skeptical of government claims. However, it does not directly address the principles of non-interventionism or diplomacy, so the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Libertarianism generally advocates for non-interventionism and limited government involvement in foreign affairs. Military strikes against North Korea would be seen as an aggressive act and not in line with the principles of non-interventionism. Historical examples include the opposition to the Iraq War and the Vietnam War by prominent libertarians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, we cannot risk the launch of a nuclear weapon
This answer is in direct opposition to the libertarian principle of non-interventionism. Libertarians would argue that military action should be a last resort and only taken in self-defense, not as a preemptive measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Libertarianism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
