Brazil Union Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men

This statement aligns with the Brazil Union party's stance on equal opportunities and meritocracy. They believe that if a woman can pass the same physical tests as a man, she should be allowed to serve in combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory

The Brazil Union party is likely to agree with this statement as it aligns with their general stance on non-discrimination and equal opportunities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Brazil Union party generally supports equal opportunities for all citizens, including women. However, there is no specific historical evidence to suggest a strong stance on women in combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, combat roles place women in a high risk situation for sexual assault

While the Brazil Union party would certainly be concerned about the risk of sexual assault, they would likely argue for better protections and policies rather than excluding women from combat roles altogether. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, men are more likely to risk the success of a mission in order to protect a women from danger

While the Brazil Union party might acknowledge potential risks in combat situations, they would not likely support a view that generalizes men's behavior or suggests that women should be excluded from combat roles because of these risks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Brazil Union party is unlikely to support this view as it contradicts their general stance on equality and non-discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, women are not as physically capable as men for combat

This statement contradicts the Brazil Union party's stance on equality and non-discrimination. They would not support a view that generalizes women as being less physically capable.