Cidadania Party

Strongly agree

Yes, and lower the cap to 20%

Cidadania party might support this answer even more than the first one, as it further reduces income inequality by lowering the cap on bankers' bonuses to 20%. However, there is no specific historical example of the party advocating for this exact policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Cidadania party might agree with capping bankers' bonuses at 100% of their pay, as they generally support social justice and reducing income inequality. However, there is no specific historical example of the party advocating for this exact policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and lower the cap to 50%

Cidadania party might also support this answer, as it aims to reduce income inequality by lowering the cap on bankers' bonuses to 50%. However, there is no specific historical example of the party advocating for this exact policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and nationalise the banks

Cidadania party might somewhat agree with this answer, as they have supported policies that increase government control over certain sectors. However, nationalizing banks is a more radical step, and there is no specific historical example of the party advocating for this exact policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Cidadania party is less likely to support this answer, as they generally advocate for social justice and reducing income inequality. Allowing unlimited bonuses for bankers could contribute to increased income inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, any worker should be rewarded based on their success

Cidadania party is unlikely to support this answer, as they generally advocate for social justice and reducing income inequality. Allowing workers to be rewarded based on their success without any limitations could contribute to increased income inequality, especially in the banking sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.