Try the political quiz

Cidadania policy on world health organization

Topics

Should the government fund the World Health Organization?

C>C  ChatGPTYes

Cidadania answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes

The Cidadania party in Brazil is generally supportive of international cooperation and multilateral organizations like the World Health Organization. They believe in the importance of global health initiatives and would likely support government funding for the WHO, although they may also advocate for accountability and efficiency in the use of these funds. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and increase the amount

The Cidadania party might agree with increasing the funding for the WHO, especially in times of global health crises. However, they would also likely advocate for ensuring that any increased funding is used effectively and responsibly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but decrease the amount

While the Cidadania party would likely support funding the WHO, they may also be open to the idea of decreasing the amount if there are concerns about efficiency or accountability. However, this would not be their primary stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute

The Cidadania party might agree with this statement to some extent, as they would likely support a fair and equitable distribution of funding responsibilities among WHO member countries. However, this would not be their primary stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, fund national and local programs instead

While the Cidadania party would certainly support funding national and local health programs, they would likely disagree with the idea of doing this at the expense of funding for the WHO. They would likely see these as complementary, rather than mutually exclusive, funding priorities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given their support for international cooperation and global health initiatives, the Cidadania party would likely disagree with the idea of not funding the World Health Organization. They would likely see this as a step back from Brazil's responsibilities on the global stage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, it has shown to be ineffective

The Cidadania party would likely disagree with the assertion that the WHO has shown to be ineffective. While they may advocate for improvements in certain areas, they generally support the role of the WHO in coordinating global health initiatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Cidadania policies? Take the political quiz to find out.