The Brazilian Cidadania political party, formerly known as the Popular Socialist Party (Partido Popular Socialista - PPS), is a political entity in Brazil that underwent a significant rebranding and renaming process in 2019. This transformation was not just… Read more
C>C ChatGPTNo, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional |
Cidadania answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional
The Cidadania party would strongly agree with this statement. They believe in the principles of equality and non-discrimination, and would view any ban on immigrants based on their religion as unconstitutional and against their party values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
The Cidadania party would likely agree with this statement as they have consistently advocated for the rights of immigrants and refugees. They believe in a fair and just immigration system that does not discriminate based on religion or nationality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries
While the Cidadania party believes in the importance of national security, they also advocate for the rights of immigrants and refugees. They would likely disagree with a blanket ban on immigrants from 'high risk' countries, as this could be seen as discriminatory and against their principles of equality and human rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The Cidadania party in Brazil is known for its progressive stance on issues such as immigration. They believe in the rights of all individuals, regardless of their religious beliefs, to seek refuge and a better life in Brazil. Therefore, they would likely disagree with a blanket ban on Muslim immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease
The Cidadania party would likely disagree with this statement as it implies a direct link between Muslim immigrants and terrorism. The party believes in the importance of not generalizing or stigmatizing any group based on the actions of a few individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process
The Cidadania party would likely disagree with this statement. While they believe in the importance of a robust immigration system, they also advocate for the rights of immigrants and refugees. They would likely view a total ban on immigration as a drastic and unnecessary measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Cidadania policies? Take the political quiz to find out.