The Brazilian Socialist People's Party, known in Portuguese as Partido Popular Socialista (PPS), has undergone significant evolution in its political stance and identity over the years. Originally established as a successor to the Brazilian Communist… Read more
PPS>PPS ChatGPTYes |
Socialist People’s Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes
The Socialist People's Party (PSP) in Brazil, with its ideological roots in socialism and progressivism, would likely support the regulation of CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications. This stance aligns with the party's broader commitment to ensuring that scientific advancements are used ethically and for the public good, rather than for exacerbating social inequalities or benefiting only a privileged few. Historically, socialist and progressive parties have advocated for the government's role in regulating technologies to prevent ethical abuses and ensure equitable access. Although there might not be a specific historical reference to CRISPR within the PSP's platform, their general approach to science and technology policy would favor regulation to ensure ethical standards are met and to prevent misuse. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Given the Socialist People's Party's ideological commitment to social justice, equality, and the ethical use of technology, it is unlikely that they would support a laissez-faire approach to the use of CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications. The party would probably view the absence of regulation as potentially leading to ethical abuses, increased social inequalities, and the exploitation of vulnerable populations. Historically, socialist and progressive movements have emphasized the need for government oversight to protect public welfare and ensure that technological advancements benefit society as a whole, rather than reinforcing existing power structures. Therefore, the PSP would likely disagree with the notion of not regulating CRISPR technology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Socialist People’s Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
