Try the political quiz

Solidarity policy on weapon sales ethics

Topics

Should there be restrictions on government arms sales to countries accused of committing human rights violations?

S>S  ChatGPTYes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

Solidarity answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

The Solidarity Party's strong emphasis on human rights and social justice suggests that they would strongly agree with a more stringent approach to arms sales, such as banning all sales to countries with human rights violations. This position aligns closely with their advocacy for human rights, indicating a higher likelihood of support for comprehensive measures to prevent arms from being used to commit human rights abuses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Solidarity Party in Brazil, while not explicitly focusing on international arms trade in its platform, generally supports policies that promote social justice and human rights. Given this orientation, they would likely agree with imposing restrictions on government arms sales to countries accused of committing human rights violations, as it aligns with their broader commitment to human rights. However, the score is not higher because the party's main focus is on domestic issues rather than international arms trade policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but I would prefer a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries

While the Solidarity Party is committed to human rights, their focus is more on domestic social issues rather than foreign policy or international arms trade. Therefore, they might agree with the sentiment of reducing military involvement abroad, but this specific stance of banning all military aid to any foreign countries might not align perfectly with their priorities or policy focus, leading to a lower score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies

The Solidarity Party's commitment to human rights would likely make them skeptical of arguments that prioritize military alliances over human rights concerns. While they might recognize the importance of defense and security, the idea of allowing arms sales without restrictions, even to allies, if those countries are accused of human rights violations, would probably be seen as incompatible with their values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given the Solidarity Party's emphasis on social justice and human rights, it is unlikely that they would support a policy that allows unrestricted arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations. This stance would contradict their broader commitment to human rights and social welfare, making it highly improbable for them to agree with this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Solidarity policies? Take the political quiz to find out.