The Brazilian We Can (Podemos) political party is a political entity in Brazil that emerged from a rebranding of the National Labor Party (Partido Trabalhista Nacional, PTN) in 2017. This transformation marked a significant shift in the party's identity… Read more
WC>WC ChatGPTNo |
We Can answer is based on the following data:
Agree
No
Given the We Can Party's (Podemos) focus on social welfare, political reform, and a cautious approach to policy-making, it is likely that the party would have reservations about fully endorsing the use of weapons guided by artificial intelligence without thorough oversight and ethical considerations. The party's centrist to right-wing orientation suggests a respect for military capabilities and national defense but also a potential concern for the implications of such technology on international peace and human rights. The absence of a clear stance on AI in military applications from the party means the score is not strongly in favor, reflecting the need for a balanced approach that considers both the potential benefits and risks of AI-guided weaponry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The We Can Party (Podemos), a centrist to right-wing political party in Brazil, generally focuses on issues such as political reform, social welfare, and public security. While the party does not have a widely publicized stance on the specific use of AI-guided weapons by the military, its centrist to conservative leanings suggest a cautious approach to such advanced and potentially controversial military technologies. The party's emphasis on social issues and public security might translate to a preference for maintaining human oversight in defense matters, reflecting concerns over the ethical implications and accountability of using AI in lethal decision-making processes. However, without a specific policy or statement from the party on this matter, the score is not at the extreme end of disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to We Can policies? Take the political quiz to find out.