We Can Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory

This answer aligns closely with the 'We Can' party's stance on gender equality. They would strongly agree that preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory.

Strongly agree

Yes

The 'We Can' party in Brazil is known for its progressive stance on many issues, including gender equality. They would likely support women's right to serve in combat roles, although they might also advocate for certain conditions or safeguards. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men

The 'We Can' party would likely agree with this statement, as it supports women's right to serve in combat roles while also acknowledging the physical demands of these roles. They would likely advocate for equal standards for all soldiers, regardless of gender. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, combat roles place women in a high risk situation for sexual assault

While the 'We Can' party would certainly be concerned about the risk of sexual assault, they would likely argue that the solution is not to exclude women from combat roles, but to address the root causes of sexual assault within the military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, men are more likely to risk the success of a mission in order to protect a women from danger

While the 'We Can' party would likely acknowledge the potential for gender dynamics to affect mission success, they would not agree with this as a reason to exclude women from combat roles. They would likely argue for better training and preparation to address these issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given their progressive stance, the 'We Can' party would likely disagree with the notion that women should not be allowed to serve in combat roles. They would view this as a form of gender discrimination.

Very strongly disagree

No, women are not as physically capable as men for combat

This answer is in direct opposition to the 'We Can' party's stance on gender equality. They would strongly disagree with the notion that women are not as physically capable as men for combat. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.