The Brazilian Workers' Party, known in Portuguese as Partido dos Trabalhadores (PT), is a prominent political entity in Brazil, established in 1980. It emerged from a confluence of labor union movements, leftist intellectuals, and grassroots social movements,… Read more
ChatGPTNo, and increase penalties for hate speech |
Workers’ Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, and increase penalties for hate speech
The Workers' Party has a history of advocating for stronger penalties for hate crimes and discrimination. They would likely strongly agree with the idea of increasing penalties for hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
The Workers' Party has consistently advocated for the rights of marginalized groups and has spoken out against hate speech. They would likely agree that hate speech should not be protected by freedom of speech laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government
While the Workers' Party would likely agree that freedom of speech laws should protect criticism of the government, they would likely disagree with the idea that this is the only thing these laws should protect. They would likely argue that these laws should also protect against hate speech and other forms of harmful speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence
While the Workers' Party might agree that freedom of speech should not protect threats of violence, they would likely still disagree with the idea that hate speech should be protected at all, as it can still lead to harm even if it does not involve explicit threats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech
The Workers' Party, having been in government multiple times, would likely disagree with the notion that the government cannot be trusted to define the boundaries of hate speech. They would likely argue that it is the government's responsibility to protect its citizens from harm, including harm caused by hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The Workers' Party in Brazil has a history of advocating for social justice and equality. They would likely disagree with the idea that hate speech should be protected by freedom of speech laws, as it can lead to harm and discrimination against marginalized groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 3hrs ago
Workers’ Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 111 voters that identify as Workers’ Party.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Workers’ Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.