@ISIDEWITHQuestionstransportationStarted 7yrs agoActive 1yr ago

Should the government increase spending on public transportation?

+
Expand
+ Settings x  National Conservatism

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 2.1k National Conservatism voters.

56%
Yes
44%
No
47%
Yes
30%
No
5%
Yes, and provide more free public transportation
10%
No, and we should privatize more public transportation services
4%
Yes, but only if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions
3%
No, we have more important issues that need funding
1%
No, and we should reduce current spending
1%
No, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.1k National Conservatism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 2.1k National Conservatism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from National Conservatism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9JNGKL7from Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, and provide more free public transportation and do more to come up with cheep and environmentally friendly solutions that don't lower efficiency and quality of life

 @99YHSG4answered…2yrs2Y

Donald trump an distribution is the decrease plan jobless loss with stirke mandated peoples rights

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2 days2D

Congress Calls Trump's Gaza Plan "Bizarre And Incoherent"

Trump proposed unprecedented U.S. control of Gaza Strip during a White House press conference with Netanyahu, suggesting "long-term ownership" that could last 10-15 years.The plan calls for nearly two million Palestinian residents to permanently relocate to neighboring countries, marking a dramatic shift from decades of U.S. policy.Congressional leaders from both parties expressed skepticism, with even Trump ally Lindsey Graham calling the proposal "problematic."Middle East experts, including former Palestinian Authority advisor Khaled Elgindy, criticized the plan as "bizarre and incoherent."White House officials argue mass relocation is the only viable option and seek to convince Egypt and Jordan to accept displaced Palestinians.The administration estimates Gaza reconstruction would take 10-15 years, far longer than the 3-5 years outlined in cease-fire agreements.The proposal lacks clear details on how to handle Palestinian resistance to relocation or potential U.S. military deployment.Saudi Arabia immediately rejected the plan, stating it wouldn't normalize ties with Israel without a clear path to Palestinian statehood.Trump expressed uncertainty about the current cease-fire's durability while presenting his proposal.The plan faces significant implementation challenges and could complicate other regional objectives, including Israel-Saudi normalization efforts.

▲  2321 replies