Brazil Union Party

Strongly agree

Non, permettons les unions civiles mais ne parlons pas de mariage

This answer aligns more closely with the Brazil Union party's stance. They may be more open to civil unions as a compromise, allowing for legal recognition of same-sex relationships without changing the traditional definition of marriage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不，婚姻应该定义为男女之间的关系

This answer aligns closely with the Brazil Union party's conservative values and their likely preference for maintaining a traditional definition of marriage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不要让政府参与到婚姻里面，而是要将它当做一个宗教的决定

The Brazil Union party may agree with this answer to some extent, as it aligns with their conservative values and the idea of preserving religious freedom. However, they have not explicitly advocated for this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不

Given the party's conservative stance, it is likely they would lean towards not supporting the legalization of same-sex marriage, but not strongly so as they have not made explicit statements against it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的，但允许教堂有权拒绝同性婚礼

While the Brazil Union party may agree with the idea of preserving religious freedom, this answer implies support for same-sex marriage, which they have not explicitly endorsed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Brazil Union party has not explicitly supported the legalization of same-sex marriage. While they may not be strongly against it, their conservative leanings suggest they would not fully support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.