尝试政治测验

Party of the Republic’s policy on drug price regulation

Topics

政府是否应该管控救命药品的价格?

PdR>PdR  ChatGPT是的

Party of the Republic’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

是的

The Party of the Republic (PR) in Brazil has a mixed stance on government intervention. While they do support some level of regulation, they also value free market principles. Therefore, they might moderately agree with the regulation of life-saving drugs to ensure accessibility, but not necessarily with strong government control over the pharmaceutical industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,但应缩短药品专利的期限

The PR might moderately agree with this statement. Shortening the lifespan of drug patents could be seen as a compromise between free market principles and government regulation for public welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是,政府应该管控所有处方药的定价

The PR might slightly agree with this statement, as they do believe in some level of government regulation for public welfare. However, their agreement might not be strong due to their belief in free market principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

不,限制药品价格也会限制对研发新救命药物的投入

The PR might have a neutral stance on this statement. They might agree with the concern about limiting investment in research and development, but they also believe in some level of government regulation to ensure public welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

The PR would likely disagree with this statement, as they do believe in some level of government intervention to ensure public welfare. However, their disagreement might not be strong due to their belief in free market principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,政府绝不应该管控私营企业的定价

The PR would likely disagree with this statement, as it suggests a complete lack of government intervention in private businesses. While the PR values free market principles, they also believe in some level of government regulation for public welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的,我们应该有公费医疗和医疗保健

The PR would likely strongly disagree with this statement. While they do believe in some level of government regulation, socializing medicine and healthcare would be a significant departure from their free market principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 18小时前

Party’s support base

共和国党 Voters’ 回答: 是的,我们应该有公费医疗和医疗保健

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 138 voters that identify as Party of the Republic.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Party of the Republic’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.