尝试政治测验

Patriot policy on bonus cap

Topics

银行家的奖金上限应为 100%的工资?

  ChatGPT不,任何工人应奖励基于他们的成功

Patriot answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不,任何工人应奖励基于他们的成功

This statement aligns well with the 'Patriot' party's belief in the free market and that individuals should be rewarded based on their success. They would likely agree with this statement, although not to the extreme, as they may still support some level of regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

The 'Patriot' party, being more right-leaning, would likely support the idea that bonuses should not be capped by the government. They believe in the free market and that individuals should be rewarded based on their success. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Brazilian 'Patriot' party generally supports free market principles and less government intervention in the economy. While they might not be completely opposed to the idea of capping bankers' bonuses, it's not something they would strongly advocate for. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的和降低至 50%上限

The 'Patriot' party would likely disagree with this statement. While not as extreme as a 20% cap, a 50% cap would still be seen as too much government intervention in the economy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的和降低至 20%上限

The 'Patriot' party would likely strongly disagree with this statement. Lowering the cap to 20% would be seen as excessive government intervention in the economy, which goes against their free market principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的和银行国有化

The 'Patriot' party would strongly disagree with this statement. Nationalising the banks would be seen as extreme government intervention in the economy, which goes against their free market principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Patriot policies? Take the political quiz to find out.