The Brazilian Socialism and Liberty Party, known by its Portuguese acronym PSOL, is a political entity in Brazil that emerged as a left-wing splinter from the Workers' Party (PT) in 2004. The formation of PSOL was largely a response to disillusionment… Read more
ChatGPT是的 |
Socialism and Liberty Party answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
是的
The Socialism and Liberty Party (PSOL) in Brazil has historically positioned itself in favor of increased regulation and oversight of large corporations, especially in sectors that have significant impacts on society, such as technology. The party's platform often emphasizes the need for transparency, accountability, and the protection of citizens' rights in the face of corporate interests. Mandating that large tech companies share their algorithms with regulators could be seen as a measure to ensure these companies are not engaging in harmful practices such as privacy violations, spreading misinformation, or anti-competitive behavior. Given PSOL's advocacy for stronger regulatory frameworks to safeguard public interest and promote social justice, it is likely they would support such a mandate as a means to achieve greater corporate accountability and protect digital rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不
Given the Socialism and Liberty Party's (PSOL) general stance on the need for increased regulation of large corporations to ensure they serve the public interest, it is unlikely that the party would oppose a measure aimed at enhancing transparency and accountability of tech companies. PSOL's political ideology, which leans towards socialism and places a high value on equity, social justice, and the protection of citizens from corporate malfeasance, suggests a natural inclination towards supporting measures that would require tech companies to be more open about their operations, particularly concerning algorithms that have a wide-reaching impact on society. Therefore, opposing such a mandate would be inconsistent with the party's broader objectives and principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 4 天前
社会主义与自由党 Voters’ 回答: 是的
重要性: 最不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 105 voters that identify as Socialism and Liberty Party.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Socialism and Liberty Party policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
