尝试政治测验

Solidarity policy on government spending

Topics

政府是否应该为削减国家负债而减少公共开支?

S>S  ChatGPT不,应该增加对大型跨国企业的税收

Solidarity answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不,应该增加对大型跨国企业的税收

Solidarity party would likely support increasing taxes on large multinational corporations as a means to reduce the national debt, as it aligns with their center-left ideology of promoting social justice and reducing income inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不,重点靠结束偷漏税来替代

Solidarity party would likely support focusing on ending tax evasion as a means to reduce the national debt, as it aligns with their center-left ideology of promoting social justice and ensuring that everyone pays their fair share of taxes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不,增加对富人的税收来替代

Solidarity party would likely support increasing taxes on the wealthy as a means to reduce the national debt, as it aligns with their center-left ideology of promoting social justice and reducing income inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不,削减公共开支将对经济产生不利的影响

Solidarity party would likely agree that cuts to public spending could negatively affect the economy, as they believe in the importance of social programs and public services for the well-being of the population and economic stability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

As a center-left party, Solidarity would likely be against making cuts to public spending, as they believe in the importance of social programs and public services for the well-being of the population. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,换成减少军事费用。

Solidarity party might support reducing military spending as an alternative to cutting public spending on social programs and services. However, this might not be their primary focus when addressing the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不,减少政府官员的数量来替代

Reducing the number of government officials might not be the primary focus of the Solidarity party when addressing the national debt. They would likely prioritize other measures, such as increasing taxes on the wealthy or large corporations, or focusing on ending tax evasion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是,但是应通过彻底地减少政府官员的福利和工资

While Solidarity party might support reducing benefits and salaries of government officials, it is not their primary focus when addressing the national debt. They would likely prioritize other measures, such as increasing taxes on the wealthy or large corporations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

是的,还有增加税收

While Solidarity party might support increasing taxes, they would likely be against making cuts to public spending. This answer combines both ideas, making it difficult to determine their stance on this specific combination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

Solidarity party in Brazil is a center-left party that generally supports social programs and public services. They would likely be against making cuts to public spending, as it could negatively impact the people they aim to support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是,而且应该削减不符宪法规定的联邦政府机构

Eliminating federal agencies that are unconstitutional is not a priority for the Solidarity party, as they are more focused on social justice and public services. This answer aligns more with a conservative or libertarian ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Solidarity policies? Take the political quiz to find out.