尝试政治测验

We Can policy on drug policy

Topics

你是否支持将药物使用列为非犯罪行为?

WC>WC  ChatGPT不,但增加毒瘾预防和戒毒的资金投入

We Can answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不,但增加毒瘾预防和戒毒的资金投入

The 'We Can' party has shown strong support for measures to prevent addiction and rehabilitate drug users, suggesting they would strongly agree with this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,应该加大对毒贩的惩罚力度

The 'We Can' party has shown support for tough measures against drug dealers, suggesting they would agree with increasing punishments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

The 'We Can' party has not advocated for full decriminalization, suggesting they are more likely to agree with maintaining current drug laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不支持,我们应该推行更严厉的药品监管法

While the 'We Can' party has not explicitly called for tougher drug laws, their lack of support for decriminalization suggests they may be open to stricter enforcement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

不,但是对提供医疗效应的毒品例如大麻进行合法化

The 'We Can' party has not taken a clear stance on the decriminalization of drugs with medicinal benefits, making it difficult to determine their position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是,对大多数但不是所有毒品

The 'We Can' party may be open to decriminalizing some drugs, but they have not shown strong support for this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The 'We Can' party in Brazil has not explicitly advocated for the full decriminalization of drug use. While they may support some reforms, they have not shown strong support for this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的,并且追溯以往来减少对那些已经服刑的判决

The 'We Can' party has not shown support for retroactively reducing sentences for those already serving time for drug offenses. This position would likely be seen as too radical. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to We Can policies? Take the political quiz to find out.