尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  经济。

We Can policy on gig worker tax reporting

Topics

Should online payment platforms be forced to report all transactions over $600 to the IRS?

WC>WC  ChatGPTNo, private transactions should be kept private

We Can answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, private transactions should be kept private

This answer aligns most closely with the 'We Can' party's stance on economic freedom and less government intervention. They would likely strongly support the idea that private transactions should be kept private, arguing that this is essential for economic freedom and individual privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, unless the transaction is considered income

This answer aligns well with the 'We Can' party's stance on economic freedom and less government intervention. They would likely argue that only transactions considered as income should be reported to the IRS, as this would minimize intrusion into private transactions while still allowing for necessary taxation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Given their stance on economic freedom and less government intervention, the 'We Can' party would likely lean towards not forcing online payment platforms to report all transactions over $600 to the IRS. They would likely argue that this could infringe on privacy and hinder economic activity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but the threshold should be much higher

The 'We Can' party might be more open to this option, as it still allows for some oversight of larger transactions while not being as intrusive as reporting all transactions over $600. However, they would likely still have some reservations about government intervention in private transactions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, except for low income citizens

While the 'We Can' party would likely support measures that protect low income citizens, they might see this as an unnecessary complication and prefer a simpler, less intrusive approach to taxation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The 'We Can' party in Brazil generally supports economic freedom and less government intervention. While they might see the value in tracking larger transactions for tax purposes, they would likely be hesitant to fully support such a broad measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to We Can policies? Take the political quiz to find out.