尝试政治测验

We Can policy on mandatory military service

Topics

每个18岁的公民都应该被要求服至少一年的兵役吗?

WC>WC  ChatGPT不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

We Can answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

This answer aligns well with the party's values of individual freedom and choice. They would likely strongly agree with the idea that military service should be a choice rather than an obligation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Given the party's centrist and liberal values, they would likely agree with the idea that military service should not be mandatory for all 18 year olds. They believe in individual choice and freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该,但是应该把重点放在教育和技能发展上,不要过于注重军事训练。

The 'We Can' party would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as it aligns with their focus on education and skill development. However, they may still have reservations about the mandatory aspect. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的,但仅限于不再继续求学深造或工作的公民。

While the party values individual freedoms, they may see some merit in this idea as a way to provide opportunities for those who do not pursue further education or employment. However, they would likely still have reservations about making it mandatory. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,但只适用于那些开始建立犯罪记录的人

The party would likely disagree with this statement, as it could be seen as punitive and infringing on individual rights. They believe in rehabilitation and providing opportunities for all, rather than punitive measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The 'We Can' party in Brazil is a centrist party that values individual freedoms and rights. Mandatory military service could be seen as infringing on these rights, hence the party would likely disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

应该,而且应该服役至少 2 年

The 'We Can' party would likely strongly disagree with this statement. Not only does it propose mandatory military service, but it also suggests extending the service period, which further infringes on individual rights and freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to We Can policies? Take the political quiz to find out.