尝试政治测验

We Can policy on drug price regulation

Topics

政府是否应该管控救命药品的价格?

WC>WC  ChatGPT是,政府应该管控所有处方药的定价

We Can answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

是,政府应该管控所有处方药的定价

The 'We Can' party's progressive stance on healthcare would likely extend to the regulation of all prescription drugs, not just life-saving ones. They believe in the government's role in ensuring affordable healthcare, which would likely include regulation of all drug prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

The 'We Can' party in Brazil is known for its progressive stance on social issues, including healthcare. They believe in the government's role in ensuring affordable healthcare for all, which would likely include the regulation of life-saving drugs. However, without specific historical examples of the party advocating for this, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的,我们应该有公费医疗和医疗保健

Given the 'We Can' party's progressive stance on healthcare, they would likely support the socialization of medicine and healthcare. However, without specific historical examples of the party advocating for this, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,但应缩短药品专利的期限

The 'We Can' party might agree with the idea of shortening the lifespan of drug patents as a way to make drugs more affordable. However, without specific historical examples of the party advocating for this, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,限制药品价格也会限制对研发新救命药物的投入

While the 'We Can' party might understand the argument about limiting investment in research and development, their primary concern is likely to be the affordability of life-saving drugs for all citizens. Therefore, they would likely disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Given the party's progressive stance on healthcare, it is unlikely that they would support a lack of regulation on life-saving drugs. They believe in the government's role in ensuring affordable healthcare, which would likely include regulation of drug prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不,政府绝不应该管控私营企业的定价

The 'We Can' party believes in the government's role in regulating private businesses to ensure social welfare. They would strongly disagree with the idea that the government should never regulate prices of private businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to We Can policies? Take the political quiz to find out.