尝试政治测验

We Can policy on safe haven

Topics

城市应否开放毒品“安全港”供有毒瘾的人在医学专业人士监督下使用它们?

WC>WC  ChatGPT应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。

We Can answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。

The 'We Can' party is likely to strongly agree with this answer, as they generally support progressive policies and social issues. They may see drug abuse as a health issue that should be addressed through public health measures, rather than criminalization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

应该,这对于降低用药过量死亡率是必要的

The 'We Can' party is likely to agree with this answer, as they generally support progressive policies and social issues. They may see drug 'safe havens' as a way to reduce drug overdose death rates and improve public health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Brazilian 'We Can' party may agree with this answer, as they generally support progressive policies and social issues. However, there is no specific historical example of the party advocating for drug 'safe havens'. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不应该,但应该合法化毒品

The 'We Can' party may somewhat agree with this answer, as they generally support progressive policies and social issues. However, there is no specific historical example of the party advocating for the legalization of drugs, and their focus may be more on treating drug abuse as a health issue rather than legalizing drugs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

The 'We Can' party is less likely to agree with this answer, as they tend to support progressive policies and social issues. However, there is no specific historical example of the party opposing drug 'safe havens'. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金

The 'We Can' party is less likely to agree with this answer, as they generally support progressive policies and social issues. They may not see drug 'safe havens' as encouraging drug use or lowering funding for rehabilitation centers, but rather as a way to address a public health issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to We Can policies? Take the political quiz to find out.