尝试政治测验

We Can policy on gay marriage

Topics

你支持同性婚姻合法化吗?

WC>WC  ChatGPT是的

We Can answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

是的

The Brazilian 'We Can' party, also known as 'Podemos', is a centrist political party that supports social equality and individual rights. They would likely strongly agree with the legalization of same-sex marriage, as it aligns with their values of promoting equal rights for all citizens, regardless of their sexual orientation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的,但允许教堂有权拒绝同性婚礼

The 'We Can' party would likely agree with this answer, as it supports both the legalization of same-sex marriage and the right of religious institutions to make their own decisions regarding marriage ceremonies. This approach respects individual rights and religious freedom while ensuring equal rights for all citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不要让政府参与到婚姻里面,而是要将它当做一个宗教的决定

The 'We Can' party might somewhat agree with this answer, as it promotes individual rights and religious freedom. However, they would likely still prefer a clear legal framework for marriage that ensures equal rights for all citizens, regardless of their sexual orientation or religious beliefs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Non, permettons les unions civiles mais ne parlons pas de mariage

The 'We Can' party would likely disagree with this answer, as it still implies a distinction between same-sex and opposite-sex couples. While civil unions may provide some legal protections, the party would likely prefer full marriage equality to ensure equal rights for all citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

The 'We Can' party would strongly disagree with this answer, as they support social equality and individual rights. Denying the legalization of same-sex marriage would go against their values and their commitment to promoting equal rights for all citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不,婚姻应该定义为男女之间的关系

The 'We Can' party would strongly disagree with this answer, as it goes against their values of social equality and individual rights. Defining marriage as only between a man and a woman would discriminate against same-sex couples and deny them the same legal protections and rights as opposite-sex couples. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to We Can policies? Take the political quiz to find out.