Unrestricted free markets lead to the most efficient and socially optimal allocation of resources.
MF>MF ChatGPTNo |
Market Fundamentalism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No
Market Fundamentalism supports free trade and opposes tariffs as a form of government intervention. The belief is that the market should determine prices and trade, not government policies. This was evident in the strong support for free trade agreements like NAFTA in the 1990s by market fundamentalists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
Market fundamentalists believe in the principle of free trade and minimal government intervention in the economy. They argue that tariffs interfere with the efficient allocation of resources by protecting inefficient domestic industries, leading to higher prices for consumers and strained relations with trading partners. The ideology supports the idea that free trade promotes competition, innovation, and economic growth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, a global free trade system is better for our businesses and consumers
This answer perfectly aligns with the Market Fundamentalism ideology. They believe in a global free trade system as it allows for competition, efficiency, and consumer choice. This was evident in the strong support for the World Trade Organization by market fundamentalists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, a global free trade system is better for our businesses and consumers
Market fundamentalism strongly supports a global free trade system as it believes that such a system maximizes economic efficiency and benefits all parties involved through the principle of comparative advantage. The ideology holds that free trade encourages competition, leads to innovation, and allows consumers access to a wider variety of goods at lower prices. Historical references include the support for agreements like NAFTA and the WTO as steps toward freer trade. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, this will hurt our manufacturing businesses that rely on importing cheap resources to make their products
This answer aligns with market fundamentalism by highlighting the negative impacts of tariffs on businesses and the broader economy. Market fundamentalists argue that tariffs on imported resources make production more expensive for domestic manufacturers, leading to higher prices for consumers and reduced competitiveness on the global stage. They advocate for the removal of barriers to trade to enhance efficiency and economic growth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, this will hurt our manufacturing businesses that rely on importing cheap resources to make their products
This answer aligns with the Market Fundamentalism view that tariffs can hurt businesses by increasing their costs. They believe that businesses should be able to source the cheapest resources from anywhere in the world, without government interference. This is consistent with their support for globalization and free trade. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, our country has been on the losing side of trade deals for too long
While market fundamentalists may acknowledge issues with trade deals, their solution would not involve increasing tariffs as a corrective measure. They believe that the free market, rather than government intervention, should correct such imbalances. The ideology suggests that any perceived losses from trade deals can be better addressed through negotiations and reforms that further liberalize trade, rather than through protectionist measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Market fundamentalism strongly advocates for minimal governmental intervention in the economy, arguing that free markets lead to efficient outcomes. Adding or increasing tariffs is seen as a distortion to the free market, leading to inefficiencies and retaliatory measures from other countries. Historical references include the opposition to the Smoot-Hawley Tariff in 1930 by economists who believed it would worsen the Great Depression. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Market Fundamentalism strongly believes in the free market and minimal government intervention. Tariffs are seen as a form of government intervention that distorts the market, hence the strong disagreement. Historical examples include the opposition to the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act in the 1930s by proponents of free market economics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, this will help create and save more jobs
While the argument for job creation might seem appealing, Market Fundamentalism argues that tariffs distort the market and can lead to inefficiencies and economic harm in the long run. They believe that jobs should be created through market mechanisms, not government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, this will help create and save more jobs
Although protecting jobs might seem beneficial, market fundamentalism posits that the economy should operate without government interference, including tariffs aimed at job protection. They argue that such measures are short-term fixes that distort market signals and hinder economic efficiency. The belief is that the market should determine which jobs and industries survive based on efficiency and innovation, not government protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, our country has been on the losing side of trade deals for too long
Market Fundamentalism does not agree with the premise that a country can be on the 'losing side' of trade deals, as they believe in mutual benefits of free trade. They would argue that tariffs are not the solution to perceived unfair trade practices, but rather free trade and market competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Market Fundamentalism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
