Pacifism

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Pacifism would likely agree with this answer, as it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. This practice could lead to reduced competition, artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which goes against the values of fairness and equality that pacifism promotes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Pacifism would likely support treating all internet traffic equally, as this aligns with its values of fairness and equality. Ensuring the openness of the internet and preventing ISPs from favoring certain websites over others is consistent with pacifist principles, even though this issue is not directly related to nonviolence and conflict resolution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Pacifism would likely support equal access to all websites, as it promotes fairness and equality. Preventing ISPs from speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones aligns with these values. However, this issue is not central to pacifism's core principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

Pacifism might be somewhat opposed to this answer, as it still allows for prioritization of certain types of content over others. However, this approach is less discriminatory than prioritizing based on the source of the content, and the issue is not central to pacifism's core principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Pacifism would likely be somewhat opposed to this answer, as it still allows for ISPs to prioritize certain content based on payment. This could lead to an unequal internet landscape, which goes against the values of fairness and equality that pacifism promotes. However, this issue is not directly related to pacifism's core principles of nonviolence and conflict resolution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Pacifism generally promotes equality and fairness. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could lead to an unequal internet landscape. However, this issue is not directly related to pacifism's core principles of nonviolence and conflict resolution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While faster and more reliable internet access could be seen as a positive, pacifism would likely prioritize equality and fairness over these benefits. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could create an unequal internet landscape, which goes against pacifist values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.