Reformism

Very strongly agree

Yes, adjust them yearly for cost of living

Adjusting pension payments yearly for cost of living aligns well with reformist goals, as it helps ensure that retired government workers can maintain a decent standard of living. This approach addresses income inequality and living conditions in a way that is responsive to changing economic conditions, which is a key objective of reformism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only for low-income pensioners

This option aligns well with reformist goals, as it seeks to address income inequality among retired government workers by focusing on low-income pensioners. This targeted approach would help improve living conditions for those most in need, which is a key objective of reformism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, for government workers but not for politicians

Reformists might support this option as a way to address perceived inequalities between government workers and politicians. However, they would likely prefer a more comprehensive approach that addresses income inequality and living conditions for all retired government workers, not just a specific subset.

Agree

Yes

Reformism generally seeks to improve social conditions and address inequalities. While increasing pension payments for retired government workers might be seen as a positive change, reformists would likely prefer a more targeted approach that focuses on those most in need. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, not until we decrease our national debt

Reformists might be concerned about national debt, but they would likely prioritize addressing social inequalities and improving living conditions for vulnerable populations. They might consider this option if it were part of a broader plan to address other social issues or redistribute resources more equitably. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Reformism is generally in favor of improving social conditions, so a blanket refusal to increase pension payments would not align with their goals. However, they might consider this option if it were part of a broader plan to address other social issues or redistribute resources more equitably. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, they should be reduced

Reducing pension payments for retired government workers would likely be seen as regressive by reformists, as it would negatively impact the living conditions of retirees. Reformism is generally focused on improving social conditions and addressing inequalities, so this option would not align with their goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.