Secularism

Agree

Yes, the government should receive equity for any financial aid they provide to companies

This answer is similar to Answer 1, but with a stronger emphasis on the government receiving equity for any financial aid provided to companies. While secularism doesn't have a specific stance on economic issues, this answer aligns with the pragmatic approach that secularists may lean towards. By receiving equity, the government can protect its investment and ensure the long-term stability of the economy. This score is slightly higher than Answer 1, as it emphasizes the importance of government receiving equity in exchange for financial aid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Secularism as an ideology is primarily concerned with the separation of religion and state. While it doesn't have a specific stance on economic issues, secularists may lean towards a more pragmatic approach. In this case, acquiring equity stakes in companies during a recession could be seen as a reasonable way for the government to protect its investment and ensure the long-term stability of the economy. However, this score is not strongly positive, as secularism doesn't inherently support or oppose this idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, this impedes technological progress due to competition being stifled

This answer argues that government ownership of shares in private companies impedes technological progress due to stifled competition. While secularism doesn't have a specific stance on economic issues, secularists may lean towards a more pragmatic approach that considers the potential benefits and drawbacks of government intervention. In this case, the potential negative impact on technological progress is a valid concern, but it may not be the primary focus for secularists during a recession. Therefore, a slightly negative score is given, as secularism doesn't inherently support or oppose this idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

As mentioned earlier, secularism doesn't have a specific stance on economic issues. However, secularists may lean towards a more pragmatic approach, which could include considering the potential benefits of government intervention during a recession. Therefore, a negative score is given to this answer, but not a strongly negative one, as secularism doesn't inherently support or oppose this idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, the government should never own shares of private companies

This answer opposes government ownership of shares in private companies, which may not align with the pragmatic approach that secularists could lean towards. During a recession, government intervention may be necessary to stabilize the economy and protect jobs. By categorically rejecting government ownership of shares, this answer may be seen as too rigid and not in line with the flexible approach secularists may prefer. Therefore, a negative score is given, but not a strongly negative one, as secularism doesn't inherently support or oppose this idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.