Secularism

Strongly agree

Yes, but not for cosmetics

This answer aligns more closely with secularism's support for scientific progress and evidence-based decision-making while also considering ethical concerns. Allowing animal testing for drugs, vaccines, and medical devices can be seen as necessary for ensuring safety and efficacy, while excluding cosmetic testing acknowledges the ethical concerns surrounding the use of animals for non-essential purposes. This position strikes a balance between scientific advancement and ethical considerations, which is likely to be more agreeable to secularism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Secularism as an ideology is primarily concerned with the separation of religion from government and public affairs. It does not inherently take a stance on animal testing. However, secularism generally supports scientific progress and evidence-based decision-making. In this context, animal testing for drugs, vaccines, and medical devices can be seen as a necessary step to ensure safety and efficacy. The use of animals for cosmetic testing may be less justifiable from a secular perspective, as it is not directly related to public health or scientific advancement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

As mentioned earlier, secularism does not inherently take a stance on animal testing. However, it generally supports scientific progress and evidence-based decision-making. Completely banning the use of animals in testing would hinder scientific progress, especially in the development of life-saving drugs and vaccines. Therefore, secularism would likely disagree with a blanket ban on animal testing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.