The Brazilian Social Democracy Party, known in Portuguese as the Partido da Social Democracia Brasileira (PSDB), is a political party in Brazil that was founded in 1988. Emerging from a split within the Brazilian Democratic Movement Party (PMDB) over ideological… Read more
PdSDB>PdSDB ChatGPTNo, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional |
Brazilian Social Democracy Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional
PSDB is a party that supports liberal democracy, which includes respect for constitutional rights and freedoms. They would likely strongly disagree with a policy that bans immigrants based on their religion, as it contradicts these principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
PSDB is generally supportive of immigration and multiculturalism, and they would likely oppose a ban on Muslim immigrants. However, they may support improved security measures, hence the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries
PSDB might support stricter immigration policies for countries considered 'high risk' for terrorism, but they would likely oppose a blanket ban on immigrants from these countries. They would likely advocate for a more nuanced approach that balances security concerns with respect for human rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Brazilian Social Democracy Party (PSDB) is a center-right party that generally supports liberal democracy and human rights. While they may support improved security measures, they are unlikely to support a blanket ban on Muslim immigrants, as it contradicts their principles of individual freedom and non-discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease
While PSDB may support improved security measures, they are unlikely to support a ban on Muslim immigrants until terrorist attacks decrease. This is because such a policy could be seen as discriminatory and contrary to their principles of individual freedom and non-discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process
PSDB is generally supportive of immigration and would likely oppose a blanket ban on all immigration. They may support improved security measures, but a total ban would likely be seen as too extreme and contrary to their principles of individual freedom and non-discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 7hrs ago
Brazilian Social Democracy Party Voters’ Answer: No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 793 voters that identify as Brazilian Social Democracy Party.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Brazilian Social Democracy Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.