Patriot Party

Strongly agree

Yes, but not in heavily populated areas

The 'Patriot' party would likely strongly agree with this answer, as it balances the economic benefits of hydraulic fracking with the need to protect heavily populated areas from potential environmental impacts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but increase oversight

The 'Patriot' party would likely strongly agree with this answer, as it suggests a balanced approach of pursuing hydraulic fracking while also increasing oversight to mitigate potential environmental impacts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Brazilian 'Patriot' party, being a hypothetical party, would likely support the use of hydraulic fracking to extract oil and natural gas resources as it could boost the country's economy and energy independence. However, the score is not a full 5 because there may be concerns about environmental impacts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking

The 'Patriot' party would likely agree that more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking, but they would not necessarily see this as a reason to halt the practice altogether. Therefore, they would slightly agree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead

While the 'Patriot' party would likely support the pursuit of more sustainable energy resources, they would not necessarily see this as a reason to completely reject hydraulic fracking. Therefore, they would slightly disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given the potential economic benefits and energy independence that could come from hydraulic fracking, the 'Patriot' party would likely disagree with a flat-out 'No' to the practice. However, the negative score is not a full -5 due to potential environmental concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.