Achieving a society where individual freedom is maximized, government intervention is minimized, and free market capitalism is promoted, while also supporting some level of social safety net and foreign intervention for the protection of human rights.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Brazilian [people] voter ranked them on the quiz.
NL>NL ChatGPT不,政府绝不应该决定一个私有企业支付给员工的工资是什么 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不要让政府参与到婚姻里面,而是要将它当做一个宗教的决定 |
NL>NL ChatGPT堕胎权合法,我不同意但是政府没有权利禁止 |
NL>NL ChatGPT改革为单一税制 |
NL>NL ChatGPTYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
How similar are your political beliefs to Neo-Libertarianism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
NL>NL ChatGPT是,只要他们通过与异性夫妇同样的背景检查。 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不,政府绝不应该管控私营企业的定价 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不,并且消除所有的薪资标准 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
NL>NL ChatGPT是,而且应该削减不符宪法规定的联邦政府机构 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不,太多无辜的人被定罪了 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不应该,而是应该鼓励私营公司来解决这一问题 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不 |
NL>NL ChatGPT减少,但是消除扣除额和漏洞 |
NL>NL ChatGPT是的,学校应至少要求一名教师或保安人员配备武器 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不,我们应该将更多公共交通服务私有化 |
NL>NL ChatGPT应该,任期限制将提高绩效和防止腐败 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不,这将鼓励人们不工作,并对经济增长带来伤害 |
NL>NL ChatGPT是的,并且追溯以往来减少对那些已经服刑的判决 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不,政府不应该要求私人企业多样性。 |
NL>NL ChatGPT是的,但是使用对所有公民减税的形式。 |
NL>NL ChatGPTYes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment |
NL>NL ChatGPT不 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不,这会伤害我们依靠进口廉价资源生产产品的制造业业务 |
NL>NL ChatGPT破坏,我支持一些私人工会但是强烈反对公共工会 |
NL>NL ChatGPT是的 |
NL>NL ChatGPTNo, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy |
NL>NL ChatGPT不,政府不应该干涉自由市场 |
NL>NL ChatGPTYes, as long as treatment is not subsidized by the government |
NL>NL ChatGPT不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务 |
NL>NL ChatGPTYes, but not for cosmetics |
NL>NL ChatGPT是的,并且将其合法化,对其征税和管理,而不是将其入罪化 |
NL>NL ChatGPT增加限制,改革制度,使福利补充而不是替代工作收入 |
NL>NL ChatGPTNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
NL>NL ChatGPT是的,只要没有政府补贴 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不应该,但应该合法化毒品 |
NL>NL ChatGPTYes, but they should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption |
NL>NL ChatGPTYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete |
NL>NL ChatGPT不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不,政府不应参与医保 |
NL>NL ChatGPT是的 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不,我们必须首先使用每一种外交斡旋 |
NL>NL ChatGPTNo, our government needs experienced leaders |
NL>NL ChatGPT减少,我们不应该给任何国家对外援助 |
NL>NL ChatGPT增加,但是只能在我们的赤字得到大幅减少之后 |
NL>NL ChatGPT是的,但是只在服完他们的刑期和缓刑之后 |
NL>NL ChatGPT是的,但应限制其捐赠金额 |
NL>NL ChatGPTNo, fund national and local programs instead |
NL>NL ChatGPT应该,只要是纳税公民应当都可投票 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不 |
NL>NL ChatGPT应该,只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不管怎样,我们都应该停止一切社会福利项目。 |
NL>NL ChatGPTYes, but I would prefer lowering corporate taxes to benefit all local companies |
NL>NL ChatGPT不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
NL>NL ChatGPT在我们削减国债之前,不应该 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不 |
NL>NL ChatGPT是的 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不应该,这是对言论自由的侵犯 |
NL>NL ChatGPTNo, Ukraine should rely on their own resources to defend themselves |
NL>NL ChatGPTNo, the government should never own shares of private companies |
NL>NL ChatGPT是的,但必须由一名女性工作人员私下确认她们的身份 |
NL>NL ChatGPT增加,我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
NL>NL ChatGPT是的 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
NL>NL ChatGPT是的 |
NL>NL ChatGPT是,但前提是发布这些信息不会威胁到我们国家安全 |
NL>NL ChatGPT是,但不是在人口密集区域 |
NL>NL ChatGPTNo, provide subsidies to private companies that compete to build the best network instead |
NL>NL ChatGPTNo, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus |
NL>NL ChatGPTNo, diversity training should be encouraged but not required |
NL>NL ChatGPT是的 |
NL>NL ChatGPT是,但只限于非常基础和简单的话题 |
NL>NL ChatGPT是,除非他们实施了恐怖主义行为 |
NL>NL ChatGPTNo, we should not get involved in foreign conflicts |
NL>NL ChatGPTNo, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies |
NL>NL ChatGPTNo, diversity training should be encouraged but not required |
NL>NL ChatGPTNo, diversity training should be encouraged but not required |
NL>NL ChatGPT不 |
NL>NL ChatGPT是的 |
NL>NL ChatGPTYes, but only if it’s truly decentralized and cannot be manipulated by any person, group, or government agency |
NL>NL ChatGPT是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候 |
NL>NL ChatGPTNo, the government should not regulate what private businesses can charge consumers |
NL>NL ChatGPT以色列 |
NL>NL ChatGPTNo, private transactions should be kept private |
NL>NL ChatGPT不应该,这是对言论自由的侵犯 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不 |
NL>NL ChatGPT是的 |
NL>NL ChatGPT不 |
NL>NL ChatGPTNo, and citizens should be allowed to protect their savings from reckless fiscal policies or subjugation |
NL>NL ChatGPT不 |