尝试政治测验

Workers’ Party’s policy on mandatory military service

Topics

每个18岁的公民都应该被要求服至少一年的兵役吗?

  ChatGPT不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

Workers’ Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

This answer aligns strongly with the Workers' Party's emphasis on individual rights and freedoms. They believe that individuals should have the choice to serve in the military, rather than it being a requirement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

The Workers' Party is likely to agree with this statement as it aligns with their stance on individual rights and freedoms. They have historically advocated for policies that prioritize education and social services over military spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该,但是应该把重点放在教育和技能发展上,不要过于注重军事训练。

The Workers' Party might agree with this statement to some extent, as it emphasizes education and skill development. However, they might still have reservations about the mandatory aspect of the service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,但仅限于不再继续求学深造或工作的公民。

While the Workers' Party might see the value in providing opportunities for those not pursuing further education or employment, they would likely disagree with the mandatory nature of this proposal, as it could be seen as discriminatory or punitive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,但只适用于那些开始建立犯罪记录的人

The Workers' Party would likely disagree with this statement as it could be seen as punitive and discriminatory. They have historically advocated for rehabilitation and social services for those with criminal records, rather than punitive measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Workers' Party in Brazil has a history of advocating for social justice and individual rights. Mandatory military service could be seen as infringing on these rights. Furthermore, the party has not shown strong support for military-focused policies in the past. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

应该,而且应该服役至少 2 年

The Workers' Party would strongly disagree with this statement. It not only advocates for mandatory military service, but also extends the duration to two years. This goes against the party's stance on individual rights and their preference for social services and education over military spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 1天前

Party’s support base

工人党 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,939 voters that identify as Workers’ Party.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Workers’ Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.