Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
经济 › 同工同酬
T>T Personal answerNo, this is irrelevant because the gender wage gap is a myth |
社会 › Hate Speech
T>T Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
T>T Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
医保 › 精神健康
T>T Personal answerYes and also incentivize private companies to address this issue as well. |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
T>T Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
T>T Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 外国选举
T>T Personal answerNo, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy |
社会 › Gender Transition
T>T Personal answerNo, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions |
环境 › Animal Testing
T>T Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
T>T Personal answer不 |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
T>T Personal answer是的 |
医保 › 安全港
T>T Personal answer不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
T>T Personal answerYes, but they should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
T>T Personal answerNo, athletes should compete based on the biological sex that is listed on their birth certificate |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
T>T Personal answer不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠 |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
T>T Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
总统大选 › Mental competency testing
T>T Personal answerNo, I would prefer term limits instead |
医保 › World Health Organization
T>T Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
T>T Personal answer是的 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
T>T Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
T>T Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Four-day Workweek
T>T Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
T>T Personal answerCompanies should be allowed to regulate their own political advertising policies. |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
T>T Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
T>T Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Ukrainian Defense Funding
T>T Personal answerNo, we cannot afford to give economic resources right now |
经济 › State Ownership
T>T Personal answerNo, this impedes technological progress due to competition being stifled |
移民 › 技术移民
T>T Personal answer增加,我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
T>T Personal answer不 |
移民 › High Risk Immigrant Ban
T>T Personal answer不 |
医保 › Medical Consensus
T>T Personal answerNo, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus |
环境 › Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
T>T Personal answerNo, provide subsidies to private companies that compete to build the best network instead |
经济 › Cryptocurrency
T>T Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Weapon Sales Ethics
T>T Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 公民考试
T>T Personal answer不,就连大多数公民都无法通过公民资格测试 |
移民 › 双重国籍
T>T Personal answer是的 |
Housing › High density residential buildings
T>T Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
T>T Personal answer不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格 |
经济 › Decentralized Finance
T>T Personal answerYes, but only if it’s truly decentralized and cannot be manipulated by any person, group, or government agency |
外交政策 › 乌克兰
T>T Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Israeli Palestinian Conflict
T>T Personal answerBoth equally |
环境 › EV Subsidies
T>T Personal answer是的 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 19 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.