Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 堕胎
9>9 Personal answer主张堕胎合法,提供节育、性教育以及更多社会服务能帮助减少堕胎数量 |
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
9>9 Personal answerLess, and there should be no privatization of the healthcare industry |
社会 › LGBT收养权
9>9 Personal answer是,只要他们通过与异性夫妇同样的背景检查。 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
9>9 Personal answer是的,社交媒体上有太多的假新闻和误报 |
经济 › 政府支出
9>9 Personal answer不,削减公共开支将对经济产生不利的影响 |
国内政策 › 携带武器的教师
9>9 Personal answer不应该,请雇用受过专业训练的安保人员 |
环境 › 环境规制
9>9 Personal answer是的,为生产替代能源提供更多激励措施 |
交通运输 › 公共交通
9>9 Personal answer是,而且提供更多免费公共交通 |
经济 › 全民基本收入
9>9 Personal answer是的,所有人都应获得一份收入以支付包括食物与住房在内的必需品 |
国内政策 › 毒品政策
9>9 Personal answer是的,并且追溯以往来减少对那些已经服刑的判决 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
9>9 Personal answer不应该,但是我们应该增加在为犯人提供教育和技能培训服务方面的资金 |
医保 › 大麻
9>9 Personal answer是的,并且将其合法化,对其征税和管理,而不是将其入罪化 |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
9>9 Personal answer不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
9>9 Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
9>9 Personal answer不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
9>9 Personal answerreduzir ou reajustar, pois não é cabível mais de 70% da verba destinada ao exercito ser para gastos pessoais, enquanto apenas 10% são de fato investimentos. |
罪行 › 罪犯投票权
9>9 Personal answer是的,但是只在服完他们的刑期和缓刑之后 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerYes, and create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine |
移民 › 技术移民
9>9 Personal answer减少,而且政府应该更多地鼓励我国公民为担任这些工作做好准备。 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answer是的,任何缴纳税费的人都应该有投票的权利 |
环境 › 水力压裂法
9>9 Personal answer是的,但是要加大监督力度 |
移民 › 公民考试
9>9 Personal answer是,但只限于非常基础和简单的话题 |
移民 › 双重国籍
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.